Ask Dr. Cobb

Tao and Creativity

Publication Month: 
March 2013
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
What is the relation between the Tao and process thought?

The questioner no doubt recognizes remarkable congeniality between Taoist thought and the contemporary tradition of process thought in the West. Taoism, like Buddhism, is an ancient process tradition like. But whereas Buddhism was a conscious rejection of a dominant substantialist mode of thought, the Tao seems more to articulate established sensibility. Probably process thinking has been native to East Asia for a very long time. 

After Process

Publication Month: 
May 2013
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
What comes after process theology?

I have not thought in these terms. That is a confession of limitation. It is a good question, and I appreciate the stimulus to think about it. But I assume there is no one answer. I also assume that there are many forms of Christianity for which the question is irrelevant.

No One Process Church

Publication Month: 
April 2013
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Is there a distinctive process ecclesiology?

No. There is no one process ecclesiology. The kind of “church” appropriate for Quakers is quite different from that appropriate for Lutherans or Catholics. These also differ. In other words, process thought does not say that one form of Christianity is the right one for all believers at all times. On the other hand, accepting a process perspective affects the way Quakers, Lutherans, and Catholics think of their church and shape it.

Preferential Option and Process

Publication Month: 
February 2013
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Can a process god have a preferential option for the poor?

This is a thoughtful question. We process theologians believe that God loves everyone and everything. God loves the sinner and the saint; the whale and the sparrow; the weak and the powerful. If having a “preferential option” meant that God loved poor people more than God loved rich people, we could not make that statement in an unqualified way.

Obama Second Term

Publication Month: 
January 2013
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Do you have any reasons to hope that President Obama will be “better” in his second term?

This is one of those many places where we need to distinguish the “hope” about which the question asks from optimistic expectation. I am not optimistic, but I do have hope.

Word and Wordless Prayer

Publication Month: 
December 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Is process prayer with or without words?

Either and both. There are many important questions that are not decided by holding the process perspective. People from many different spiritual traditions can make use of process categories to clarify, deepen, and enrich their traditions. The process perspective allows us to honor this diversity. Difference does not lead directly to judgments of truth and falsity or to the need to rank the positions. Difference as such vastly enriches the world.

Is There One Normative Process Theology?

Publication Month: 
October 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Is there one normative process theology?

Wouldn’t it be nice if there were one normative process theology – at least if it were mine! If someone else’s theology took on that role, I wouldn’t be so happy about it.

The above paragraph is intended to indicate the problem of claiming normativity for any one position on virtually any topic. People involved in the discussion might be pleased if their views were adopted as “normative.” But those whose views were rejected would not, and many of them would simply reject the idea that beliefs they did not share had any claim to authority.

Relativity of Truth or the Truth of Relativity?

Publication Month: 
November 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Does process thought affirm the relativity of truth or the truth of relativity?

This is a clever way to put a very fundamental question. It is also a wise way. The truth of relativity, which we affirm, is too often connected in people’s minds with the relativity of truth. But for process thinkers this connection is rejected. For us what has been has been, and nothing ever changes that fact. In that sense truths about the past are not relative. Similarly the structures of reality are what they are. What we believe about them does not change them.

Beyond Literal Truth and Mere Metaphor

Publication Month: 
September 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Is there a middle path between seeing process theology as literal truth and mere metaphor?

This question rightly points to the wide range of positions of process thinkers. In an earlier generation Charles Hartshorne sometimes said that some key terms apply literally to God and only metaphorically to human beings! An example is “knows.” When we say that God “knows,” we speak literally. When we say that we “know,” we do not. That is because the idea of knowing is such that what is known cannot be otherwise than as it is known. Human “knowing” does not guarantee that reality is as we “know” it. Only God’s “knowing” can do that.

Desperate Times Call for Whiteheadian Measures

Publication Month: 
August 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
In desperate times, can Whitehead help?

Some years ago I suggested that nationalism had been the dominant religion of the West for several hundred years. The Peace of Westphalia (1648) symbolized its takeover of this role from Christianism. Three hundred and ten years later, the establishment of the European Economic Community symbolized the shift from nationalism to economism.

Hopes for Process

Publication Month: 
July 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
What are some of your hopes for process over the next decade or two?

This is a fun question. I’m glad I was not asked to predict the realistic prospects of process thought. That would not be so much fun. But “hopes” are another matter. Still, I’ll try to stick with hopes that are not merely fanciful.

Process Thought's Contribution to Societal Change

Publication Month: 
June 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Can process thought contribute to cultural, social, and political reform?

I appreciate this question. My answer is, of course, yes. If I did not think so, I would not have devoted so much of my time to process thought. But before I answer positively, I should acknowledge what process thought, by itself, certainly cannot do.

How do Schleiermacher and Process relate?

Publication Month: 
May 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Schleiermacher's theology is very close to process theology, so could process be a bridge between American and continental theologies?

This is a complex question. Let me first describe where I agree. Schleiermacher was certainly an important figure in German theology. He is often called the father of liberal theology. During the nineteenth century, along with Hegel and Kant, he was a major shaper of the tradition. His basic program was renewed by Rudolph Otto, and there are clear continuations in Paul Tillich. There are certainly today adherents of this tradition.

Is Process Theology too Western?

Publication Month: 
April 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Is process theology a hopelessly Western endeavor?

I think there is a sense in which theology as such is “hopelessly” Western if that means inescapably tied to Christianity. What we understand by theology brings together history and philosophy in a way that Christians cannot avoid. We have to discern universal meanings in particular historical events since we assert that particular historical events have importance for all people.

Is Whitehead's Philosophy Atomistic?

Publication Month: 
March 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Is Whitehead's Philosophy Atomistic?

This is a good question, and like most good questions, the answer is both “yes” and “no,” or “it all depends on what you mean by atomism.”

Process and Post-Structuralism

Publication Month: 
February 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
Do you find the discussion between process thought and post-structuralism worthwhile?

A simple answer to this question is “Yes.” But that would mean very little. I think that process thinkers can benefit from discussion with any group of thoughtful people who approach matters from a different point of view. There is no one right point of view. We are all shaped by our particular histories and they have alerted us to different features of reality. We can enlarge our horizons and enrich our understanding by engaging many discussion partners.

God as the Power of the Future

Publication Month: 
January 2012
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
How do you feel about understanding God as "the power of the future"?

The idea that the future exercises power on the present appears and reappears on the fringes of science, philosophy, and theology. It can be associated with the denial of the full reality of time, but it can also be associated with strongly temporal doctrines. Lewis Ford has engaged in a revision of Whitehead’s thought so as to take account of this idea.

Neuroscience and Physical Determinism

Publication Month: 
December 2011
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
In recent years, neuroscience research has increasingly suggested that our freedom is an illusion and that determinism in one form or another is the best explanation of human agency. How does process thought respond to these neuroscientific claims?

There is one element of this question about which I am doubtful. It states that neuroscience has “increasingly” suggested that our freedom is an illusion. My experience with neuroscience is very limited, but it has given me hope that there is a strong counter trend within it. In any case, I would say that science as a whole has long implied that our freedom is an illusion, and the physiological psychology that has evolved into neuroscience was, from its beginning, committed to demonstrating physical determinism in the relation of the brain to subjective experience.

How does Process understand Tillich's "virtues"?

Publication Month: 
November 2011
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
I am reading of Tillich's book, Courage to Be, and wondered how courage and other "virtues" are thought of and/or explained in process theology?

Whitehead did not write a book on ethics, and some of his followers have tried to supply what is missing. In A Christian Natural Theology, I even developed a deontological basis for a Whiteheadian ethics. I thought when I wrote that book, and I think now, that one can formulate in a very abstract way how we should decide to constitute ourselves, moment by moment. Whitehead assumed that we should so constitute ourselves as to increase value in the world and therefore for God.

How can grace operate in a religiously pluralist world?

Publication Month: 
October 2011
Author - First Name: 
John B.
Author - Last Name: 
Cobb, Jr.
Question: 
I am interested in the relevance of prevenient grace to Christian interaction with non-Christian religions. Can religion itself (however it is defined) be a means of prevenient grace through which a person experiences salvation?

Prevenient grace is not a Wesleyan monopoly, but I am going to refer in my answer to Wesley. Wesley’s understanding of prevenient grace was clear, and the doctrine was important to him. In many ways, Wesley’s teaching flows into process thought, or perhaps process thought flows into Wesley. For both, God works graciously in everyone. That gracious working can lead to justification and sanctification, and as it does in takes on new names. That is, it is no longer prevenient but, instead, justifying and sanctifying.

Syndicate content